Keywords
Virtual Focus Group Discussion
online platforms
Google Meet
Social distancing
Qualitative methods
How to Cite
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic triggered reactive innovation using digital technology in research methods. This paper presents experiences from the methodological component of conducting virtual focus group discussions among the highly dispersed island nation of the Maldives during the COVID-19 pandemic. The sample consisted of 99 participants divided among 28 virtual focus groups. The most populated regions of the Maldives i.e., Male’, Addu, Laamu, and Kulhuduffushi were selected. Additionally, two smaller islands with a population less than 400 people, namely, Rasgatheem and Madifushi, were also selected. The focus groups were determined by adopting a life cycle approach representing groups from childhood, youth, working age group, and senior citizens. To ensure inclusivity, three separate groups of men, women, and people with disabilities were also selected. The data collected was then subjected to thematic analysis. The findings indicated that with open discussions and engagement, facilitators were able to draw out shy participants and manage dominant participants in the Virtual Focus Group Discussion (VFGD). The caveat, however, is the need for internet connectivity and digital literacy of participants. The findings provided an in-depth understanding of the research problem. VFGD can become a mainstream data collection technique in the social qualitative inquiry especially with difficult-to-access and remote populations.
References
Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019). Using Zoom video conferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919874596.
Bennett, N. J., Roth, R., Klain, S. C., Chan, K., Christie, P., Clark, D. A., & Wyborn, C. (2017). Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biological Conservation, 205, 93-108.
Berg, B. L. (1989). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 4th ed. Long Beach, CA: Allyn and Bacon, California State University.
Bruin, W. B., & Bennett, D. (2020). Relationships between initial COVID-19 risk perceptions and protective health behaviors: A national survey. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 59(2), 157-167
Burrows, D., & Kendall, S. (1997). Focus groups: What are they and how can they be used in nursing and health care research? Social Sciences in Health, 3, 244– 253.
Chabeda, S., Kahindi, J., & Ryneveld, M. V. (2018, 23 06). Preparing data: the not-so-simple stage of transcription and translation. Retrieved from Global Health Social Science: https://globalhealthsocialscience.tghn.org/articles/preparing-data-not-so-simple-stage-transcription-and-translation/
Cheng, K. W. (2007). A study on applying focus group interviews on education. Reading Improvement, 44(4), 194-199.
Clark, L., Birkhead, A. S., Fernandez, C., & Egger, M. J. (2017). A transcription and translation protocol for sensitive cross-cultural team research. Qualitative Health Research, 27(12), 1751-1764.
Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science and Medicine, 14, 1667– 1676.
Davidson, C. (2009). Transcription: Imperatives for qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(2), 35-52.
Dhiraagu (2020). Dhiraagu Annual Report. https://www.dhiraagu.com.mv/clients/Dhiraagu_CA2BB809-3A22-485B-A518-DA6B6DE653A5/contentms/img/document/ar-report/Dhiraagu_Annual-Report_2020.pdf
Fern, E. F. (1982). The use of focus groups for idea generation: the effects of group size, acquaintanceship, and moderator on response quantity and quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(1), 1-13.
Fonteyn, M. E., Vettese, M., Lancaster, D. R., & Bauer-Wu, S. (2008). Developing a codebook to guide content analysis of expressive writing transcripts. Applied Nursing Research, 21(3), 165-168.
Gibbs, A. (1997). Focus groups. Social Research Update, 19(8), 1-8.
Hayward, C., Simpson, L., & Wood, L. (2004). Still left out in the cold: Problematizing participatory research and development. Sociologia Ruralis, 44(1), 95-108.
Health Protection Agency [HPA]. (2021). COVID-19 Statistics Dashboard. Retrieved November 9, 2021, from https://COVID19.health.gov.mv/dashboard/?c=0
Hennink, M. M. (2007). International focus group research: A handbook for the health and social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, University of Cambridge.
Hewson, C. (2008). Internet-mediated research as an emergent method and its potential role in facilitating mixed methods research. In Hesse-Biber, S. N., Leavy, P. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 543-570). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Horrell, B., Stephens, C., & Breheny, M. (2015). Online research with informal caregivers: Opportunities and challenges. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(3), 258-271.
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173– 202.
Kamberelis, G. & Dimitriadis, G. (2005). Focus groups: Strategic articulations of pedagogy, politics, and inquiry. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 887–908). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Khadka, C., Hujala, T., Wolfslehner, B., & Vacik, H. (2013). Problem structuring in participatory forest planning. Forest Policy and Economics, 26, 1– 11.
Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of Focus Groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16, 103– 121.
Kitzinger, J. (1995). Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311, 299– 302.
Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Lindau, H., Ramos-Gomez, F., Garza, J., Finlayson, T., Pareja, M., Liu, J., & Gansky, S. (2022). Unexpected benefits of and lessons learned from shifting to virtual focus group discussions in the BEECON trial. BMC Research Notes, 15(1), 1-5.
Litosseliti, L. (2004). Using focus groups in research. London, UK: Continuum.
Lobe, B., Morgan, D., & Hoffman, K. A. (2020). Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406920937875.
O. Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20-32.
Mendes de Almeida, P. F. (1980). A review of group discussion methodology. European Research, 8, 114– 120.
Merton, R. K., & Kendall, P. L. (1946). The focused interview. American Journal of Sociology, 51, 541– 557.
Merton, R. K., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P. L. (1956). Focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures, 2nd ed. A division of Macmillan Inc, New York, USA: The Free Press.
Morgan, D. L., & Krueger, R. A. (1998). The focus group guidebook. USA: Sage Publications.
Meierkord, C. (2018). English in paradise: The Maldives: English is rapidly establishing itself as a second language in a society transforming from fishing to tourism and trade. English Today, 34(1), 2-11. doi:10.1017/S0266078417000475
Moore, T., McKee, K., & McCoughlin, P. (2015). Online focus groups and qualitative research in the social sciences: their merits and limitations in a study of housing and youth. People, Place and Policy Online, 9(1), 17-28.
Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 129-152.
Morgan, S. P., Lye, D. N., & Condran, G. A. (1988). Sons, daughters, and the risk of marital disruption. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 110-129
Mukherjee, N., Huge, J., Sutherland, W. J., Mcneill, J., Van Opstal, M., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., & Koedam, N. (2015). The Delphi technique in ecology and biological conservation: Applications and guidelines. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 1097– 1109.
NBS. (2020). Statistical Pocket Book of Maldives. Maldives: National Bureau ofStatistics and Ministry of National Planning, Housing and Infrastructure. Retrieved from http://statisticsmaldives.gov.mv/nbs/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Statistical-Pocketbook-2020.pdf
National Bureau of Statistics. (2020). National Multidimensional Poverty in the Maldives 2020. Maldives: National Bureau of Statistics. Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative & UNICEF Maldives. Retrieved from http://statisticsmaldives.gov.mv/nbs/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/MPI-Summary-Report-Updated.pdf
Neugarten, B. L., & Datan, N. (1973). Sociological perspectives on the life cycle. In P. B. Baltes & K. W Schaie (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Personality and socialization (pp. 53–69). New York: Academic Press.
Oringderff, J. (2004). “My way”: Piloting an online focus group. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(3), 69-75.
Paloniemi, S., & Collin, K. (2012). Discursive power and creativity in inter-professional work. Vocations and learning, 5(1), 23-40.
Rezabek, R. J. (2000). Online focus groups: Electronic discussions for research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1(1), 18.
Royle, S. A. (2001). A geography of islands : small island insularity. London/New York: Routledge.Seitz, S. (2016). Pixilated partnerships, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via Skype: A research note. Qualitative Research, 16(2), 229-235.
Smith, J. M. (1972). Interviewing in market and social research. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul Books.
Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Turney, L., & Pocknee, C. (2005). Virtual focus groups: New frontiers in research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(2), 32-43.
United Nations (2020). World social report 2020 Inequality In a rapidly Changing World. Retrieved September 28, 2022.
World Bank (2014). Maldives: Country Snapshot. Washington, DC: The World Bank ITU. Retrieved November 02, 2021 from https://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/SAR/maldives-country-snapshot-spring-2014.pdf.
World Bank (2020). The World Bank in the Maldives. Washington, DC: The World Bank ITU. Retrieved November 02, 2021 from https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/maldives/overview.
World Bank. (2021). Maldives Development Update, April 2021: A Digital Dawn. Washington, DC: The World Bank ITU. Retrieved November 02, 2021 from https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/93bdbd79b45eeb504743f4514f1095e1-0310062021/original/April-2021-Maldives-Development-Update.pdf